Would love to know what papers people are into at the moment.
Also, have you found techniques to help you digest papers efficiently?
Would love to know what papers people are into at the moment.
Also, have you found techniques to help you digest papers efficiently?
Iām reading the following papers by Kamalika Chaudhuri:
I will be integrating computing the statistics on these papers into my W&B dashboard. Super excited for the results.
Interesting! How do you pick the papers you want to read Diganta? Do you skim a bunch and commit to a few?
For these 2 papers, I actually watched her talk and it struck a cord since I was ideating with a colleague on an idea which is correlated to her work.
I also read papers based on the trending reports at W&B, especially those under the Reproducibility Challenge.
I just read āOmnimatte: How to Detect Objects and Their Effectsā and wrote a blog post about it.
My process for reading papers depends on why Iām reading it.
Looking for an interesting read:
Looking to learn about new field / approach:
Looking to implement / deeply understand a paper:
I love hearing about how people find and read research papers.
I am currently reading papers around semisupervised learning. To be specific, reading the SimCLR series.
I have written a blog recently on how to read papers and I specifically read papers using the same approach. It resonates a lot with what @scott shared depending on the level of interest, going about different passes. Hope others find it useful too.
I select papers to read by browsing the trending section at paperswithcode.
For example, the most recent papers Iāve been reading in depth are:
My reading process can be roughly summed up as:
I read the abstract online
If my interest is roused, I download the paper, read the introduction, skim over the method, and take a look at the figures and result tables
Unless I plan on reproducing the paper, Iāll stop at this point.
I typically want to reproduce papers when:
If I do decide to implement the paper:
I loved Morgan McGuireās guide. This is from the view of a computer graphics researcher, however, I feel that many of the key lessons generalize quite well. Recommended!